Hale v. CNA Insurance
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
The sole issue in this workers’ compensation appeal is whether the trial court erred in interpreting T.C.A. § 50-6-208(b) in such a manner as to require workers’ compensation settlements to be judicially approved pursuant to T.C.A. § 50-6-206 before such an award may be considered in determining the respective liabilities of an employer and the Second Injury Fund under T.C.A. § 50-6-208(b). For the reasons set forth below, we find no error and affirm the disposition made by the Chancellor.
The facts in this case are straightforward and essentially undisputed. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Burris v. Cross Mountain Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Gross v. National Health Enterprises, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by11 opinions
- Federated Insurance Co. v. LethcoeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Watt v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Bomely v. Mid-America Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Minton v. State Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Cox v. Martin Marietta Energy SystemsTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.