Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Hursh

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is a condemnation action brought by the State Highway Commission. The issue of compensation for the taking was determined by the jury. The jury’s award was greater than the amount tendered defendants before the commencement of the action. As a consequence, defendants were entitled to an attorney’s fee. The trial judge, after a hearing, fixed the amount of the attorney’s fee. Plaintiff contends that in the absence of a waiver of jury trial the propriety and amount of the attorney’s fee is an issue of fact for the jury. The controlling statute is OES 366.380 (9), which reads as follows:

“(9)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Pressley v. LambIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Douglas County v. MEYERSOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Peterson v. FloodArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State Board of Education v. Von ZellenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Highway Commission v. StockhoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API