Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wright v. Headrick

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1943No. 7128PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

There being divergent and sharply conflicting views as to the legislative intent, correct meaning of, and proper interpretation to be placed upon chap. 142, 1943 S.L., p. 286, chap. 146, p. 291, chap. 147, p. 293, and chap. 171, p. 359, the alternative writ of mandate herein was issued against the defendants, respectively sheriff and treas urer of Ada County, requiring them to remit monthly the funds for drivers’ licenses collected by the sheriff and deposited in the county treasury, or show cause why they refuse.

Plaintiff contends the amended statutes require the sheriff to act as examiner…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ward v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Graham v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Wright v. CallahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. RaynerIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Idaho Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. RobisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hopson v. North American Ins. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API