Legal Opinion
Cottonwood Hill, Inc. v. Ansay
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1989No. 86CA0821PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PLANK.
Lienholder, Knight & Lesher, P.C. (Le-sher), appeals the trial court’s determination that its attorney’s lien under § 12-5-119, C.R.S. (1985 Repl.Vol. 5) does not have priority over the interest of inter-venor, First Colorado Bank & Trust, N.A. We affirm.
On September 23, 1983, plaintiff, Cottonwood Hill, Inc., gave notice that it intended to exercise its option to purchase property owned by defendants, Ronald J. and Clara E. Ansay, pursuant to a lease with option to purchase. Defendants refused to convey the property because of a dispute over the purchase price.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People in Interest of MSHSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Collins v. ThuringerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- People Ex Rel. MacFarlane v. HarthunSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS, ETC. v. Berkeley VillageColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- Cottonwood Hill, Inc. v. AnsayColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burman v. Richmond Homes Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Salle v. HoweColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Fleet Real Estate Funding Corp. v. KochColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- North Valley Bank v. McGloin, Davenport, Severson & Snow, Professional Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Cottonwood Hill, Inc. v. AnsayColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.