People v. Munoz-Gutierrez
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boatright
¶ 1 In this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1, the People seek review of the trial court's order suppressing marijuana that the police discovered in a car registered to and driven by the Defendant-Appellee, Ramiro Munoz-Gutierrez. The trial court found that the People did not establish that Munoz, Gutierrez voluntarily consented to the search of his car. We determine that the trial court applied the wrong standard and hold that Munoz-Gutierresz voluntarily consented to the search when he gave oral consent. Under the totality of the cireumstances, the police's conduct did not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. ThiretSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. HydeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- People v. Chavez-BarraganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- People v. Chavez-BarraganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- People v. Chavez-BarraganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- People v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.