Legal Opinion
Prendergast v. Drew
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
This action seeks to set aside a conveyance of three pieces of real estate executed by James Prendergast and delivered to his daughter Margaret under these circumstances: While Mr. Prendergast was in sound mind and free from undue influence, he with the intention of making an absolute and unconditional conveyance and without any understanding or agreement between himself and his daughter Margaret, executed and delivered this conveyance upon the consideration of love and affection. Mr. Prendergast made this conveyance just before he was to undergo a serious operation whose results he feared.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dexter Yarn Co. v. American Fabrics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Raymond v. SellickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
- Candee v. Connecticut Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Wiley v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- City National Bank v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Truslow Fulle, Inc. v. Diamond Bottling CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Eaton v. BloodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Hebrew University Assn. v. NyeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- MacArthur v. CannonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. SlaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.