Legal Opinion

Brakebill v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1913No. 2542PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from, Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; (?. C. Abernathy, Judge. Action by J. E. Brakebill against the Chicago, Bock Island & Pacific Bailway Company. Prom the overruling of a demurrer to defendant’s answer, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BEE WEE, C.

On September 16, 1907, the plaintiff in error, J. E. Brakebill, entered the employment of the defendant in error, Chicago, Bock Island & Pacific Eail-way Company, as a common day laborer in its shops located in the city of Shawnee. He received an injury while so employed in the month of February, 1908. He later filed his suit to . recover damages for this injury, alleging that it was caused through the negligence of the railway company. One of the grounds of defense in the answer filed by the railway company alleges that the plaintiff, Brakebill, on or about the 16th day…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gray v. Reliable Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Inman v. Clyde Hall Drilling CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Keys Keys v. Williamsburg City Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Pennington Grocery Co. v. Wood & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. ChowningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API