Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2002No. CV-01-0437-PRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

52 P.3d 765 (2002)

203 Ariz. 196

Michael HERNANDEZ and Ida Hernandez, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

STATE of Arizona, Arizona State Park Service, Defendants-Appellees.

No. CV-01-0437-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

August 26, 2002.

Janet Napolitano, Attorney General, By Daniel P. Schaack, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Attorney for the State of Arizona.

Goldberg & Osborne, By Joel T. Ireland, Tucson, Attorney for Michael and Ida Hernandez.

OPINION

McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to address whether Rule 408, Arizona Rules of Evidence (Ariz. R. Evid.),…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Breuer Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Toronado Systems of America, Inc., and Michael Marshak A/K/A Michael MajchrzakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Graber v. City of AnkenySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Affiliated Manufacturers, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Readenour v. Marion Power ShovelArizona Supreme Court · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API