Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Tatem v. Dixon

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1924No. 5,493PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

The fact conditions in State ex rel. Mills v. Dixon, 68 Mont. 526, 219 Pac. 637, are applicable to this case except as we shall supplement them in this opinion. On October 6, 1923, the state board of education requested the state board of examiners to issue and sell series F of educational bonds of the state of Montana in the sum of $555,000, pursuant to the provisions of initiative measure No. 19. In the Mills Case the resolutions of the board of education requesting the state board of examiners to issue series D and E (pursuant to section 2 of Initiative Measure No. 19, Session Laws of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bonner v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State ex rel. Mills v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomsen v. ThomsenOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Judd v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API