City of Idaho Falls v. Pfost
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
Respondent instituted this action to restrain appellants from enforcing secs. 61-2201 to 61-2211, I. C. A., against the municipality, on two grounds: that the act does not apply, and was not intended by the legislature to apply to municipal corporations, and that such application, if so intended, and as attempted, violates secs. 2 and 4, art. 7, of the Constitution; thus this action does not involve the constitutionality of the statute, merely as to the second point, the constitutionality of its application.
Section 61-2201, I. C. A., 1 imposes a tax of one-half mill per Mlowatt hour on the…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Patton v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DIST. v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.