Legal Opinion

City of Idaho Falls v. Pfost

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1933No. 5906PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Respondent instituted this action to restrain appellants from enforcing secs. 61-2201 to 61-2211, I. C. A., against the municipality, on two grounds: that the act does not apply, and was not intended by the legislature to apply to municipal corporations, and that such application, if so intended, and as attempted, violates secs. 2 and 4, art. 7, of the Constitution; thus this action does not involve the constitutionality of the statute, merely as to the second point, the constitutionality of its application.

Section 61-2201, I. C. A., 1 imposes a tax of one-half mill per Mlowatt hour on the…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Patton v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1902

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DIST. v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API