Legal Opinion
Village of Little Chute v. Walitalo
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 2, 2002No. 01-3060PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, J.
¶ 1. Todd Walitalo appeals his judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant, first offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(l)(a). Walitalo argues that his consent to submit to a blood test was coerced. He contends that the threatened sanction of a loss of driving privileges constitutes a coercive measure that invalidates his consent for Fourth Amendment purposes. See Wis. Stat. § 343.305. We disagree and affirm the conviction.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. The following facts are stipulated. At approximately 2:14 a.m. on March 16, 2001, Walitalo…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- State v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ClappesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- William B. Tanner Co. v. Estate of FesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PadleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- State v. FaustWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. WintlendCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- City of Kingman v. LubbersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
- State v. BlackmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.