Legal Opinion

Miller v. Subiaco Academy

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided May 2, 2005No. 05-2025PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAWSON, District Judge.

Currently before the Court is Separate Defendant Subiaco Academy’s (hereinafter “Subiaco”) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 2) for failure to bring the cause of action during the applicable statute of limitations. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs Response to Subiaco’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) and Subiaco’s Reply. (Doc. 15.)

I. Motion to dismiss standard

In ruling on a motion to dismiss, the district court must accept the allegations contained in the complaint as true, and all reasonable inferences from the complaint must be drawn in favor of the nonmoving party. Hafley…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Does v. PresleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025
  2. Does v. PresleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025
  3. Does v. PresleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025
  4. Does v. PresleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2026
  5. Does v. PresleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API