Legal Opinion

People v. Van Skander

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1937No. Crim. 1942PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of forgery. He made a motion for a new trial but the motion was denied. He also made a motion for probation but that motion was also denied. Later sentence was imposed and he appealed from the judgment and the order denying a new trial.

The charging part of the information is as follows: “The said Bruce Van Skander, on or about the 8th day of August, A. D. nineteen hundred and thirty-six, at the City and County of San Francisco, State of California, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously, falsely, fraudulently and with intent to prejudice,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SinghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State v. Security Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. SotakWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. GranilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. EsrigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. MathisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. People v. OdmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. In Re De Beau Carr Ex Rel. SteveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API