Legal Opinion

Plunkett v. Dendy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1916PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Cullman Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. Robert C. Brickell. Action by W. A. Plunkett against E. G. Dendy and others, to enforce a landlord’s lien for rent, in which sub-tenants were joined with the chief tenant. From a judgment of discontinuance granted because of the striking of the sub-tenant, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The judgment from which the appeal is taken, after setting out the several interlocutory orders made by the court, concludes as follows: “Thereupon the defendant E. G. Dendy moves the court for a discontinuance in this cause, which motion being submitted fo the court and duly considered and understood by the court, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that said motion be and hereby is granted. It is further ordered and adjudged by the court that the defendants have and recover of the plaintiff W. A. Plunkett the costs of this suit in this behalf expended, for which let execution issue.”(1)…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Shriner v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. de Graffenried v. BreitlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Pickett v. Doe ex rel. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Speed v. CockeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  5. Bell v. OttsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McClurkin v. McClurkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Wright v. McCordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. I. Epstein & Brother v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Clifford v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Crawford v. MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API