Legal Opinion

Astin v. Carden

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1942No. 14226PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

On presentation of the petition the judge granted a temporary restraining order applicable to all of the defendants. At the interlocutory hearing, he passed an order refusing to appoint a receiver as prayed, and revoking the restraining order to the extent of relieving the defendant administrator altogether from its operation, and relieving the widow “in her proceeding for a year’s support.” It is this latter order that is complained of in the bill of exceptions.

We shall deal first with the modification feature. Whether this order…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co. v. BruhlmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Beecher v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Tinsley v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. McCord v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Crawford v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Furr v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Hoffman v. ChesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Jones v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Conner v. YawnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API