Hale Bros. v. Milliken
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. W. P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff corporation brought this action to recover from the defendants the sum of $13,973 for damages alleged to have been sustained by it on account of the failure of defendants to deliver within the time agreed upon certain steel to be used in the erection of plaintiff's building in the city of San Francisco. The alleged damages consist of the following items: 1. The sum expended by plaintiff in the preparation of the steel for use after its delivery, $577.65, the pleaded agreement being that it should be delivered in condition so that it could be placed as received in the building;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Booth v. Cleveland Rolling Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Hawthorne v. SiegelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Richardson v. ChynowethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Mitchell v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Higgins v. California Petroleum & Asphalt Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Peterson v. ChaixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Fries v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Standard American Dredging Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.