Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Keim

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1935No. 29183PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is a suit in which Delmar W. Hammond, as guardian and next friend, seeks to recover under the workmen’s compensation law for the death of his father-in-law.

Immediately prior to May 26, 1930, on which date he received injuries which resulted in his death, Ed Linquist, hereinafter called the deceased, had been employed by Jacob Keim, doing business as Keim Construction Company, in superintending the construction of a building at Tecumseh, Nebraska, for which he was being paid $1.50 an hour. Deceased was a widower, and left one adult son and an adult daughter, being the wife of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Speas v. Boone CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Siedlik v. Swift & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Struve v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Solheim v. Hastings Housing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Dombach v. Olkon Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Sheets v. Glenwood Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Luke v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Meyer v. First United Methodist ChurchNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API