Murphy v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant, Thomas Murphy, takes this appeal from the order of the lower court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee and against plaintiff-appellant in his suit to recover benefits under his automobile insurance policy. Appellant argues that the court abused *238its discretion in granting summary judgment because the court’s order was based on a misinterpretation of the relevant statute of limitations provision of the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act.1 We agree with appellant and reverse the order of summary judgment and remand…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Just v. Sons of Italy HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Bond v. GallenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Petraglia v. American Motorists InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Augostine v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Murphy v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Murphy v. PRUD. PROP. AND CAS. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983