Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1983No. 194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant, Thomas Murphy, takes this appeal from the order of the lower court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee and against plaintiff-appellant in his suit to recover benefits under his automobile insurance policy. Appellant argues that the court abused *238its discretion in granting summary judgment because the court’s order was based on a misinterpretation of the relevant statute of limitations provision of the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act.1 We agree with appellant and reverse the order of summary judgment and remand…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Just v. Sons of Italy HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Bond v. GallenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Petraglia v. American Motorists InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Augostine v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Murphy v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Murphy v. PRUD. PROP. AND CAS. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API