Petraglia v. American Motorists Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that appellee, American Motorists Insurance Company, was not entitled to summary judgment because it: (1) failed to prove that it was prejudiced by appellant’s commencement of this action beyond the policy period of limitation; and (2) is estopped from asserting the policy limitation requiring suit to be commenced within one year of the loss. 1 We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the lower court.
Summary judgment “shall be rendered if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Lardas v. Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- General State Authority v. Planet InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Prime Medica Associates v. Valley Forge Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Metal Bank of America, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fennell v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Hospital Support Services, Ltd. v. Kemper Group, Inc. And Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Estes v. Alaska Insurance Guaranty Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.