SHAY v. JohnKAL, INC
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Levin and Boyle, JJ.
The question presented is whether the "name and retain” provision of the dramshop act bars continued maintenance of a dramshop action where the "allegedly intoxicated person” has been dismissed from the action because the plaintiff and the allegedly intoxicated person accepted a court-ordered mediation award.
We hold that the "name and retain” provision *397does not, in such a case, bar continued maintenance of a dramshop action.
i
Timothy and Rosemary Shay were injured when an automobile he was driving and in which she was riding as a passenger was struck by a vehicle being…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Putney v. HaskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Riley v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Baker v. KalanjMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Green v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Green v. WilsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Green v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Green v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Hensley v. Investors Four, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.