Green v. Wilson
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This is a negligence and dramshop action. Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the trial court’s dismissal of their action on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction over the allegedly intoxicated person, defendant Fraser Wilson. The remaining defendants were reluctantly dismissed by the trial court, over plaintiffs’ objections, on the basis of the name and retain provision of the dramshop act, MCL 436.22(6); MSA 18.993(6). We reverse.
Plaintiffs, both Michigan residents, allege that the dramshop defendants (Vivio’s, Inc., and Jason Enterprises, Inc.) served alcohol to defendant Wilson in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Jeffrey v. Rapid American Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Witbeck v. Bill Cody's Ranch InnMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Mozdy v. LopezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Schneider v. LinkfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Commissioner of Insurance v. ArcilioMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Green v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Green v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Green v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1997