Legal Opinion

Elliott S. Peterson Co. v. Parrott

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 26, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, C. J.

Exceptions. Directed verdict for plaintiff. Action on promissory notes given in part payment for automobile. *382Plea general issue and brief statement claiming partial failure of consideration and right to recoupment because of certain alleged defects in the automobile.

Defendant purchased a new car of plaintiff on April 6, 1929, the pi’ice thereof being $2,170. An old car was accepted in part payment, some cash was paid and notes given to make up the total. Of these notes, defendant paid all but two, each for $200, the subject matter of this suit.

When the car was purchased, a written order…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allen v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Rose v. Chrysler Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Rared Manchester NH LLC v. Rite Aid of New Hampshire IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  4. Lawson v. McLeodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  5. American Fidelity Co. v. MahoneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API