Elliott S. Peterson Co. v. Parrott
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, C. J.
Exceptions. Directed verdict for plaintiff. Action on promissory notes given in part payment for automobile. *382Plea general issue and brief statement claiming partial failure of consideration and right to recoupment because of certain alleged defects in the automobile.
Defendant purchased a new car of plaintiff on April 6, 1929, the pi’ice thereof being $2,170. An old car was accepted in part payment, some cash was paid and notes given to make up the total. Of these notes, defendant paid all but two, each for $200, the subject matter of this suit.
When the car was purchased, a written order…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Allen v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Rose v. Chrysler Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Rared Manchester NH LLC v. Rite Aid of New Hampshire IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Lawson v. McLeodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
- American Fidelity Co. v. MahoneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.