Legal Opinion
American Fidelity Co. v. Mahoney
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided October 31, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
Defendant for stated reasons had notified the plaintiff that an individual operator’s liability insurance policy and an additional insured endorsement therefor both of which the plaintiff had proposed to use did not meet with the defendant’s official approval. The plaintiff thereupon filed in the Superior Court its appeal from such a determination by the defendant and the controversy has been reported to this court. R. S., c. 60, § 6, P. L., 1957, c. 42; Rule 72, Maine Rules of Civil Procedure, 155 Me. 573.
The defendant had summarized his disapprobation of the policy and endorsement in two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Elliott S. Peterson Co. v. ParrottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
- Spaulding v. American Realty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
- J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. StahlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
- Dutch v. Gamage Brokerage Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Associated Hospital Service of Maine v. MahoneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
- American Fidelity Co. v. MahoneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961