Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 30, 1985No. Appeals, Nos. 1265 C.D. 1984, 1266 C.D. 1984, 1267 C.D. 1984, 1268 C.D. 1984, 1269 C.D. 1984, 1270 C.D. 1984, 1271 C.D. 1984, 1272 C.D. 1984, 1273 C.D. 1984, 1274 C.D. 1984, 1275 C.D. 1984, 1276 C.D. 1984, 1277 C.D. 1984 and 1278 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Palladino,
Petitioners in these consolidated appeals are unemployment compensation claimants who are representative of the members of the United Steel Workers of America, Local 3187 (Union). The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirmed a referee’s decision denying benefits under Section 402 (d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Laiv),1 concluding that Petitioners’ unemployment resulted from a strike rather than a lock-out by F. M. Weaver, Inc. (Employer).2
*557The relevant facts, as found by the referee and ■adopted by the Board, are as follows. The Employer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Small Tube Products, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- McCormick Dray Lines, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hoffman v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Babcock & W. Co. v. Un. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Jehn v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Klapec Truck. Co. v. Un. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Murdoca v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.