T.M. v. State
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THORNE, Judge:
11 The Parents of LM. (Parents) appeal from the trial court's denial of their motion for a new trial. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
2 Following the disposition of their first, direct appeal in this matter, see In re L.M., 2001 UT App 314, 37 P.3d 1188, Parents filed a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.1 In support of their motion, Parents submitted affidavits from Dr. Ellen Clark, a Nevada pathologist, and Kathleen Peele, an Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the University of Nevada, Reno, and an expert in the field of child sexual abuse.
3 Dr. Clark,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barson v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
- T.M. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- State v. BlasusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- ProMax Development Corp. v. MattsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- American Rural Cellular, Inc. v. System Communication Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Adoption of A.F.K.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- In Re State Ex Rel. C.L.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006
- UDOT v. LEJ InvestmentsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State Ex Rel. ClUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. LmCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.