Legal Opinion

T.M. v. State

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 20, 2003No. 20020431-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THORNE, Judge:

11 The Parents of LM. (Parents) appeal from the trial court's denial of their motion for a new trial. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

2 Following the disposition of their first, direct appeal in this matter, see In re L.M., 2001 UT App 314, 37 P.3d 1188, Parents filed a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.1 In support of their motion, Parents submitted affidavits from Dr. Ellen Clark, a Nevada pathologist, and Kathleen Peele, an Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the University of Nevada, Reno, and an expert in the field of child sexual abuse.

3 Dr. Clark,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barson v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. T.M. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  3. State v. BlasusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. ProMax Development Corp. v. MattsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  5. American Rural Cellular, Inc. v. System Communication Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of A.F.K.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  2. In Re State Ex Rel. C.L.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  3. UDOT v. LEJ InvestmentsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  4. State Ex Rel. ClUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. LmCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API