In Re State Ex Rel. C.L.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
DAVIS, Judge:
¶ 1 A.M.K. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s termination of her parental rights and denial of her motion for a new trial. Mother does not challenge the grounds for termination, see Utah Code Ann. § 78-3a-407(l) (2002), but instead asserts that the State failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that it was in her children’s best interests to terminate her parental rights, see id. § 78-3a-402(2) (2002). We reverse and remand for a new trial.
¶ 2 Mother filed a motion for a new trial under rule 59 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. See Utah…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re State in Interest of JpCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- T.M. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Office of the Guardian ad Litem v. A.M.K.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. ClUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re State Ex Rel. ClCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006