Legal Opinion

Li-Lan Tsai v. Rockefeller University

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 7, 2001No. 00 CIV 329 SASPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Li-Lan Tsai, proceeding pro se, brings suit against her former employer under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12112 et seq., and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging retaliation, failure to accommodate, unequal terms and conditions of employment, and unlawful termination. Defendant, the Rockefeller University (“RU”), moves to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is denied.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Lorenzo CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRM COPY CENTERS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Winston v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Donhauser v. GoordDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
  3. Christiansen v. Omnicom Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Preston v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. Benjamin v. Brookhaven Science Associates, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API