Legal Opinion

Milligan v. Milligan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 14, 1955No. 12842PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This is a divorce action. Bessie Milli-gan urges'that James Milligan as plaintiff did not prove grounds for'a divorce and that the judgment is wrong wherein ‘it gave him a personal judgment for $600 to reimburse his separate estate for ‘ improvements and benefits to her separate estate. The judgment is affirmed.

Milligan’s testimony, which ' was corroborated, showed that he was elderly and disabled, that he suffered a stroke by which he lost the use of his arm and leg, that because of his physical impairment he had difficulty in eating and waiting upon himself; tjiat his wife…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dakan v. DakanTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. McCullough v. McCulloughTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Mobley v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Mozisek v. MozisekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Howle v. HowleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Kirby v. KirbySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API