Milligan v. Milligan
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
This is a divorce action. Bessie Milli-gan urges'that James Milligan as plaintiff did not prove grounds for'a divorce and that the judgment is wrong wherein ‘it gave him a personal judgment for $600 to reimburse his separate estate for ‘ improvements and benefits to her separate estate. The judgment is affirmed.
Milligan’s testimony, which ' was corroborated, showed that he was elderly and disabled, that he suffered a stroke by which he lost the use of his arm and leg, that because of his physical impairment he had difficulty in eating and waiting upon himself; tjiat his wife…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dakan v. DakanTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- McCullough v. McCulloughTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Mobley v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ex Parte PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Mozisek v. MozisekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Thompson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Howle v. HowleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Kirby v. KirbySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.