Legal Opinion

State v. Hooker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1918No. 14247PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered January 11, 1917, upon a trial and conviction of larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.

Defendant, R. L. Hooker, was tried separately upon an information charging him and one Pete Stalberge with the crime of larceny under the provisions of Rem. Code, § 2601, subdivision 2. The first count charged the commission of the crime by color or aid of a false instrument or order. No evidence was introduced in support of this count. The second count charged the commission of the crime by false representations and pretenses. Though extremely inartificially drawn, being overladen with unnecessary verbiage and other unsustained charges, it sufficiently alleged that the defendant, Hooker,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Hamilton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Branch v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. People v. RectorNew York Supreme Court · 1838

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. SwensonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. MauleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. State v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. StratfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API