Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Courtney

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 7, 2020No. 2:12-cv-01466Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON THOMAS GERALD ERICKSON, Case No. 2:12-cv-01466-IM Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. RICK COURTNEY, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent. IMMERGUT, District Judge. Petitioner. Thomas Gerald Erickson (“Erickson”), an inmate at the Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, brings this habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Erickson raises multiple grounds for relief premised on the assertion that his prosecution was time barred. For the reasons set forth below, this Court DENIES Erickson’s…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API