Legal Opinion

Fligelman v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1932No. 20493. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Fligelman and other operators of gasoline filling stations in the city of Chicago filed a bill in the circuit court of Cook county praying that the city be enjoined from enforcing a certain ordinance which provided that no gasoline filling station should be operated in said city without a license. Answer was filed and the cause was referred to a master, who found all issues of law and fact in favor of the city. The chancellor overruled exceptions to the master's report and entered a decree dismissing the bill for want of equity. From this, decree Fligelman and the others appealed.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spiegler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. People ex rel. Busching v. EricssonIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Metropolis Theater Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Koy v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Kizer v. City of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Paul Harris Furniture Co. v. MorseIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Father Basil's Lodge, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Belmar Drive-In Theatre Co. v. Illinois State Toll Highway CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Carrizales v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Nicketta v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API