Legal Opinion
Uxbridge Co. v. Poppenheim
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 2, 1926No. 12005PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.
Action to establish the boundary lines between the lands of the plaintiff and the lands of the defendants.
The complaint alleges:
“That a dispute has heretofore existed, and still exists, between plaintiff and defendants as to the proper location of the dividing lines between said lands of plaintiff and the lands of the defendants, which said dividing lines have never been definitely established by either of the parties to this action.
“That plaintiff has made several attempts to have said dividing lines amicably ascertained and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watkins v. ChildsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
- McCeery Land & Investment Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Boone v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
3Cited by15 opinions
- First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank v. KnottsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Knox v. BoganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Kirkland v. GrossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Butler v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- McRae v. HamerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.