Legal Opinion

Uxbridge Co. v. Poppenheim

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 2, 1926No. 12005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Action to establish the boundary lines between the lands of the plaintiff and the lands of the defendants.

The complaint alleges:

“That a dispute has heretofore existed, and still exists, between plaintiff and defendants as to the proper location of the dividing lines between said lands of plaintiff and the lands of the defendants, which said dividing lines have never been definitely established by either of the parties to this action.
“That plaintiff has made several attempts to have said dividing lines amicably ascertained and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watkins v. ChildsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
  2. McCeery Land & Investment Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  3. Boone v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank v. KnottsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Knox v. BoganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Kirkland v. GrossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Butler v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. McRae v. HamerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API