Legal Opinion
Tines v. Brown Shoe Company
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 15, 1956No. 29409PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSER, Commissioner.
This is a claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, §§ 287.010-287.800 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. A referee awarded but on review the industrial commission denied compensation on the ground that there was no accident within the meaning of the Act. This appeal is from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County reversing the avvard of the commission and reinstating the award of the referee.
Kathleen Tines, employed by Brown Shoe Company in August, 1952 as a bookkeeping machine operator, worked as such through December 6, 1952. Her work consisted of placing papers in…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hussmann-Ligonier Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Thompson v. Sunset Country ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
- Miller v. St. Joseph Transfer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Palmer v. Knapp-Monarch Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wolfgeher v. Wagner Cartage Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Davies v. Carter Carburetor, Division ACF Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Bauer v. Independent Stave CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Bess v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Crow v. Missouri Implement Tractor CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.