Legal Opinion

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. E. L. Bruce Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McEinsey

E. L. Bruce Company, a Delaware corporation, referred to herein as “Bruce,” instituted this suit against E'. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Company, also a Delaware corporation, designated herein as “Du Pont,” to recover damages for a breach of express and implied warranties of a chemical known as “Lignasan,” used in treating large quantities of oak lumber.

The jury returned a verdict in favor, of Bruce for $12.6,239.82. The trial court directed a remittitur of $61,572.94, which was accepted under protest, and judgment entered for $64,666.88. Both parties appealed to the Court of Appeals.

In the trial…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tallent v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  2. Mashburn v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  3. Huddleston v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  4. McGee v. Nashville White Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  5. Marlie Trading, Inc. v. Biggs Boiler Works Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API