Legal Opinion

Marlie Trading, Inc. v. Biggs Boiler Works Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1960No. 5006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, J.

The appellant, a corporation, whose former corporate name was Haldm, Lawrence & Cicnrel, Inc., engaged in the business of exporting machinery and related products to various parts of the world, entered into a contract with The Biggs Boiler Works Company, of Akron, Ohio, for the purchase of two rotary digesters, which digesters were to be built according to specifications in writing submitted to the appellant by The Biggs Boiler Works Company. These specifications consisted of two typewritten, letter-size pages. At the end of the second page, before a last short paragraph, were the following…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Newton Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. Dubuque-Wisconsin Bridge Co. v. Board of Review of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Hellstrom v. First Guaranty BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Groves v. GrayOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Omaha Loan & Trust Co. v. County of DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matlack, Inc. v. Hupp Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. City of Akron v. Hardgrove Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API