Legal Opinion

City of Kirksville Ex Rel. Eggert v. Harrington

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

* [EDITORS' NOTE: FOOTNOTE * IS OMITTED FROM THE ORIGINAL COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT, THEREFORE IT IS NOT DISPLAYED IN THE ONLINE VERSION.]

1. — Parties. Defect of parties apparent on face of petition held waived, by answer.

2. — Appeal and Error. Mere variation in title of cause during progress of case, not a matter of substance nor affecting merits of cause held not grounds for dismissal of appeal under Court of Appeals, Rule 15.

3. — Same. Where title of cause was changed during progress of case, additional abstract was permissible to identify case.

4. — Same. In absence of allegations that…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heman v. SchulteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. State ex rel. Jones v. Mallinckrodt Chemical WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. City of Webb City v. AylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Reinert Bros. Construction Co. v. TootleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Lemon v. ShepardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API