Legal Opinion

State v. Potts

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1983No. 8317SC125PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the first two aggravating factors found by the court and the court’s failure to find more than one mitigating factor. After careful examination of both the evidence introduced at the sentencing hearing and the recent application of the Fair Sentencing Act, we conclude that the sentence is supported by the evidence and must be affirmed.

Under the Fair Sentencing Act, the sentencing judge’s discretion to impose a sentence greater or lesser than the presumptive term is bridled by the statutory requirement that he make written findings of aggravating and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. GoforthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. MidyetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. BarrancoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API