Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1999PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 Before this Court is the appeal of The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and J. Mark Mackey. They challenge the trial court’s refusal to compel arbitration or to grant a judgment N.O.V. We affirm.

¶2 This case grows out of events surrounding the termination of appellee Curtis Cooke as an insurance agent for appellant Equitable Life. Appellant Mackey was Cooke’s immediate supervisor. Cooke became an Equitable agent in 1968. He subsequently became a licensed insurance broker and began offering a wide range of products from different companies to his clients.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Beckman v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Robertson v. Atlantic Richfield Petroleum Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Harkins v. Calumet Realty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Joseph v. Scranton Times L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. v. Professional Transportation & Logistics, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Scampone v. Grane Healthcare Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Henning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API