Legal Opinion
Joseph v. Scranton Times L.P.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 18, 2008No. 2144 MDA 2006PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
POPOVICH, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the November 16, 2006 judgment entered in the Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County, in favor of Thomas A. Joseph (Appellee Joseph) and Acumark, Inc., (Appellee Acumark) (collectively Appellees) in their defamation action. The Scranton Times LP, The Times Partner, and Edward Lewis (collectively Appellants) claim that the trial court erred in entering judgment in favor of Appellees because Appellees failed to meet their constitutionally-mandated burdens to prove falsity and fault and that they failed to prove injury as a result of the alleged…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Mzamane v. WinfreyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- T. Joseph v. The Scranton Times, ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Foster v. UPMC South Side HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Joseph v. Scranton Times, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Cogley v. DuncanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.