Legal Opinion

Seikel v. City of Akron

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2010No. 25000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whitmore, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, the city of Akron, appeals from the decision of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas denying its motion for summary judgment. This court reverses and remands the matter.

I

{¶ 2} On May 20, 2006, Shannon Seikel, the nine-year-old daughter of Thomas and Kelly Seikel (collectively, “the Seikels”), was injured when a tree fell upon the vehicle in which she was traveling while on Memorial Parkway in Akron. Shannon sustained serious and debilitating medical injuries as a result. The tree that struck the vehicle fell from a lot that is owned by Akron.

{¶ 3}…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shope v. PortsmouthOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Newell v. BrookshireOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Scroggs v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Winbush v. Cincinnati Music FestivalOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. City of YoungstownDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API