Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Martin Bros., Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 1, 2006No. 26142PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

This is a workers’ compensation case. A single commissioner of the Workers’ Compensation Commission awarded attorney fees to Appellant Willie Baxter (Appellant) in connection with Appellant’s motion to compel Respondents Martin Broth ers, Inc. and Capital City Insurance (Respondents) to comply with a consent order. The commission’s appellate panel reversed the award of attorney fees, holding that under the Workers’ Compensation Act, 1 the commissioner lacked authority to grant such an award. On further review, the circuit court affirmed the appellate panel’s decision. We certified the case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hill v. Eagle Motor LinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Hernandez-Zuniga v. TickleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Porter v. Labor DepotCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Geathers v. 3V, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Doe v. South Carolina Department of Disabilities & Special NeedsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API