Legal Opinion
Fry v. Schroder
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 2013No. 09A02-1206-CT-474PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Loren H. Fry (“Fry”) interlocutorily appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to stay the civil proceeding brought against him by Terry L. Schroder and Robert C. Schroder (collectively “the Schroders”), individually and as beneficiaries and personal representatives of the Estate of David H. Schroder. Fry raises the following restated issue for our review: whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to stay the civil proceeding pending resolution of the criminal action against him.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Fry is a resident…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jones v. City of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003
- Hilliard v. JacobsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. v. Merchants Investment Counseling, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Baker MacHinery, Inc. v. Superior Canopy Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
3Cited by5 opinions
- DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson v. Travis BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Joseph D. Hardiman and Jaketa L. Patterson, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Britney R. Meux v. Jason R. CozmanoffIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Joseph D. Hardiman and Jaketa L. Patterson, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Britney R. Meux v. Jason R. CozmanoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jerome Williams v. Ron Neal (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Todd Rokita v. Board of School Commissioners for the City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025