Joseph D. Hardiman and Jaketa L. Patterson, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Britney R. Meux v. Jason R. Cozmanoff
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MASSA, Justice.
“Inevitably, in civil cases where related criminal charges are involved, tension will arise between plaintiffs’ rights to a just and timely adjudication and defendants’ rights to refuse to answer under the Fifth Amendment upon a reasonable fear of prosecution.” Nat’l Acceptance Co. of Am. v. Bathalter, 705 F.2d 924, 932 (7th Cir.1983) (internal citation omitted). The case we address today involves just this sort of tension; the civil trial court granted a limited stay of discovery against the defendant, but ordered him to respond to the plaintiffs complaint. Both sides…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- D.A. v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Austin v. NagareddyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Diego Morales v. John RustIndiana Supreme Court · 2024
- In re the Paternity of BKS, CSS v. RSKIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- In the Matter of Ma.H., Le.H., Lo.H., W.H., La.H., Me.H., and S.W. (Minor Children) M.H. (Father) and R.H. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.