Legal Opinion

In re Hall –

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 2, 2016No. 114636PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a contested original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against respondent, Kenton M. Hall, of Kansas City, Missouri, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas in 1988. Pursuant to Kansas Supreme Court Rule 211(f) (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 350), the Disciplinary Administrator filed a Notice of Appeal and Exceptions to the Hearing Panel Report regarding its dismissal of two claims brought against respondent — purported violations of Supreme Court Rule 218(c)(1) (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 401) and Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re DennisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. In re LoberSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. In Re FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. In re KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. In re MintzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re CrandallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. In re AyeshSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  3. In re Biscanin – Per CuriamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017
  4. In re Najim - (Supreme Court of Kansas · 2017
  5. In re StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API