Legal Opinion

In re Crandall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 30, 2018No. 117910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This contested attorney discipline proceeding arises out of two separate matters handled by David P. Crandall. After the Disciplinary Administrator filed a formal complaint, the chairman of the Board for Discipline of Attorneys appointed a hearing panel. The hearing panel conducted an evidentiary hearing, at which Crandall appeared in person and through counsel. The panel later issued its final hearing report in which it concluded Crandall violated six provisions of the Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct (KRPC): KRPC 1.1 (2018 Kan. S. Ct. R. 289) (competence), KRPC 1.3 (2018 Kan. S. Ct. R.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. In Re DennisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. In re LoberSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. State v. GodfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. State v. GomezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. Martin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re HuffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. In re SpradlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. In re MortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2023
  4. Estate of Castruccio v. CastruccioCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. State v. BlissCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API