Legal Opinion

In re Mintz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 2014No. 110,111PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

In this contested original attorney discipline proceeding, a panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys made findings of fact and concluded Robert A. Mintz did not violate the Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct (KRPC). Before us, the office of tire Disciplinary Administrator argues that some of the panel’s findings of fact are not supported by clear and convincing evidence and the panel’s conclusions of law are not supported. We agree and conclude Mintz violated two rules— KRPC 8.4(c) (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 655) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re DennisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. In re LoberSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. In Re FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. State v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. In re KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  2. In re Hawver (Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. In re HawkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. In re Hall –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  5. In re RumseySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API