Legal Opinion

Taliaferro v. Riddle

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1960No. Civ. No. 18788PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order setting aside the default of Dorothy, his former wife, who is one of a number of defendants originally joined in this action. The complaint was filed in 1950. On December 12,1958, notice of overruling of respondent’s demurrer to the complaint was served upon her then attorney, who obtained an order extending her time to answer to January 12, 1959. On a date not disclosed by the record, but between January 12 and February 9, 1959, respondent’s default was entered. Judgment upon the default was entered only against respondent on February 9, and respondent’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stub v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Hover v. MacKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Shively v. KochmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. HoogsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API