Legal Opinion

Homer v. Roche

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 22, 2002No. CIV.A. 02-0381(ESH)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUVELLE, District Judge.

Before the Court are plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and defendant’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiff Arthur R. Homer invokes the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 702 et seq., to challenge the Air Force’s refusal to promote him to the rank of colonel. While the Court is without jurisdiction to grant plaintiff the main relief that he seeks— direct promotion — the Court may review the Air Force decisions at issue here under the familiar “arbitrary and capricious” standard and order relief…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. John F. Kreis v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  3. Michael K. Frizelle v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Cone, George E. v. Caldera, LouisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  5. Roetenberg v. Secretary of the Air ForceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fulbright v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Roberts v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. Hill v. GerenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. Miller v. Department of the NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. Tindal v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API