Legal Opinion
Rosario-Urdaz v. Rivera-Hernandez
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided September 14, 2006No. Civil 02-1498(SEC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, the prevailing party in the instant civil action, has filed two motions requesting attorney’s fees (Dockets ##116 & 118). Despite having filed two requests for extensions of time to oppose said requests, both of which were granted by the Court, Defendants failed to oppose Plaintiffs motions. See Dockets ##120-124. After carefully reviewing Plaintiffs unopposed filings, as well as the applicable law, for the reasons set herein, Plaintiffs requests will be GRANTED as modified. Applicable Law and Analysis
In Section 1983…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Annabelle Lipsett v. Gumersindo BlancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Guillemard-Ginorio v. ContrerasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
- Michel-Ramos v. Arroyo-SantiagoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- BATISTA-RIVERA v. GonzalezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- Cortes-Reyes v. Salas-QuintanaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
- Guillemard-Ginorio v. ContrerasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.