Michel-Ramos v. Arroyo-Santiago
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PÉREZ-GIMÉNEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the prevailing party in the instant civil action, filed a petition for attorney’s fees (Docket No. 111). Defendant failed to oppose Plaintiffs motion. After carefully reviewing Plaintiffs unopposed request, as well as the applicable law, for the reasons set herein, this Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion, but reduces the amount requested.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Emmanuel Michel-Ramos filed the above-styled and captioned complaint on November 16, 2004, claiming damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as under Puerto Rico law, for a series of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Annabelle Lipsett v. Gumersindo BlancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller v. Midpoint Resolution Group, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Guillemard-Ginorio v. ContrerasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
- Cofino-Hernandez v. Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017
- Ramirez-Lluveras v. Pagan-CruzDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014